HOME

Company

TurboChiller Refrigeration

High E Refrigeration

Flooring Systems

Energy Comparison

Project Photo Index

Testimonials

News

Put our experience to work for you!

Energy Comparison

These figures represent the consumption of the ice rink chiller system only, including all circulation pumps, fans and electrical devices required for the total refrigeration system for the assumed load used in this calculation. These calculations were based upon actual manufacturers published performance data for the equipment referenced. These figures DO NOT include dehumidification, lighting, or any assorted general building use which can easily represent half of a complexes total electric billing nor are any provisions made for electrical demand charges typically billed to a complex. This information is offered for the evaluation of the specific chiller performances based upon the assumed conditions noted.


ESTIMATED YEARLY COST LESS DEMAND

Total Yearly KWH Use

.10

BASE SYSTEM

Competitive 2-100 HP System

at 37.5 ton load

621,008

$ 62,100.80

Evaporative Condenser

at 50 ton load

848,160

$ 84,816.00

at 60 ton load

1,017,792

$ 101,779.20

ROUSTAN REFRIGERATION TURBOCHILLER 22-200

Evaporative Condenser

at 37.5 ton load

312,940

$ 31,294.00

Pumpstat Variable Flow

at 50 ton load

417,253

$ 41,725.30

Variable Speed Condenser

at 60 ton load

500,704

$ 50,070.40

Active Sub-Cooling Loops

LPA Floating Head Pressure Design


POTENTIAL YEARLY SAVINGS (highest to lowest) WITH TURBOCHILLER

Competitive 2-100 HP System

at 37.5 ton load

$ 30,806.80

Evaporative Condenser

at 50 ton load

$ 43,090.70

at 60 ton load

$ 51,708.80

PROJECTED 10 YEAR SAVINGS WITH TURBOCHILLER

Evaporative Condenser

at 37.5 tons average heat load

$ 308,068.00

Pumpstat Variable Flow

at 50 tons average heat load

$ 430,907.00

Variable Speed Condenser

at 60 tons average heat load

$ 517,088.00

Active Sub-Cooling Loops

LPA Floating Head Pressure Design